|
 Other South American Geoglyphs
|
|
|
Peru Chile Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
Throughout the Pacific
coastal regions of South America there are
geoglyphs. Several indigenous cultures produced
and used geoglyphs for a variety of reasons, from
religious to astronomical. Here are some of the
other geoglyphs that can be found in Peru, Chile, and
Argentina (others will be added over time). |
|
|
According to the
Nazca-Palpa Project:
Ceramics found on
geoglyphs, stratigraphic relationships between geoglyphs
and other cultural features, as well as iconographic
parallels show that the first geoglyphs were made in
Late Paracas times at about 400 BC when motifs hitherto
graved into rocks and boulders (petroglyphs) were
transfered to the stone-covered desert surface on the
hillsides framing the valleys. These earliest figures
were not very large, showed human figures and were meant
to be seen from far away. Later on, the first geometric
geoglyphs, like straight lines and small trapezoids,
were traced in similar settings on hillsides. By Initial
Nasca times (200-1 BC) the flat plateaus above the
valley were for the first time used for the tracing of
geoglyphs that were no longer visible from the valley
floors. In Early Nasca times (AD 1-250) geoglyph making
and use reached its peak. A wide variety of geoglyphs,
including different kinds of lines, biomorphic figures,
spirals, and trapezoids, were created. All major
plateaus surrounding the valleys were occupied by large
geoglyph complexes that were used to walk on lines and
trapezoids and to deposit pottery and food along
geoglyphs and on stone platforms. In Middle (AD 250-450)
and Late Nasca times (AD 450-600) geoglyph related
activity dropped bit by bit to lower levels. Some
geoglyph sites were abandoned, and formal variety was
reduced to lines and trapezoids. New geoglyphs were
still being constructed, however, among them some of the
largest geoglyphs known in the Palpa area. This activity
ceased only at the end of the Nasca era (after AD 600)
when the Wari empire from the highlands to the east
extended its area of influence down to the south coast.
The deposition of pottery on the geoglyphs continued for
a certain time, now with ceramics in the new style,
before they were definitely abandoned before AD 800.
Geoglyph
complexes were most probably related to kin groups who
possibly shared common land rights. Members of these
groups gathered on different occasions out in the desert
to create new geoglyphs, to remodel existing ones, or to
walk along lines and trapezoids in a prescribed fashion,
depositing ceramic vessels (possibly containing food or
beverages), field crops, textiles, Spondylus
shells and other goods on geoglyph borders or on stone
platforms upon them. All these goods were in some way or
another related to concepts of water and fertility. It
is to assume that a cult revolving around these themes
guided the activities on the geoglyphs. The relative
uniformity of geoglyphs through time and space shows
that these concepts were crucial elements of the
worldview shared by the ancient inhabitants of the Nasca
region (and elsewhere). It is important to note in this
context that in a common effort vast stretches of the
desert were marked at large scale and thereby integrated
into the cultural domain of the valley-based society.
Thus, like never before or later, the hostile desert was
converted into dynamic and vibrant cultural space.
However, the geoglyphs bear not only integrative, but
also competitive elements. Visibility studies clearly
show that intervisibility was an important aspect in
geoglyph placement and order. Though the geoglyphs
themselves were usually not easily discernable from
neighboring sites, posts erected on them and people
moving around them certainly were. Geoglyph sites
therefore assumed a stage-like function, and group
activity upon them raised awareness of group identity
among members as well as outsiders. Thus, geoglyphs
played an important role in defining group status. At
the same time, geoglyph-related activity was somehow
independent of changing societal circumstances down in
the valleys. Distribution patterns of geoglyph sites
proved to be much more stable than that of settlements,
cemeteries and other cultural features. All in all,
geoglyphs can literally be understood as common ground
for all members of Nasca society.
visit the
Nazca-Palpa Project website for more information
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
One of the many recognizable
geoglyphs
just outside of Casma, Ancash, Peru. |
|
|
Continue Your Exploration |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue Your Exploration |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The Atacama Giant, Atacama Desert, Chile
|
|
|
Continue Your Exploration |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |


|
|
Quebrada de Santo Domingo
Across the river from Huaca de la Luna
Visible is the destruction caused by earth moving
close to the river valley.
|

|
|
Some photos coutesy of Melissa Massat,
Daniel Massat,
Hans Lujan and Vνctor Corcuera Cueva
|
|
|
 |


|
|
A view across the Moche River Valley
from Cerro Oreja
|

|
|
|
Related Weblinks |
|
For more information about Santo Domingo:
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Information About Petroglyphs |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
photos by: Eduardo Cinicola |
|
For Your Information |

|
|
|
|
|
|
Fine
Precolumbian Art -
We Suggest! |
|

Do you
offer related products or services?
nazca
@ mcguinnesspublishing . com
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Image
Quality |
|
A note about
image quality: images of lines and
symbols taken by air or from satellite
images are adjusted to improve contrast and
visibility of the artifact (line or symbol).
The results vary from image to image.
We apologize for the quality of some of the
images, but it is due to the original source
images, and the difficulty of
photographing subject object.
|
|
 |
|